<![CDATA[Newsroom University of Manchester]]> /about/news/ en Wed, 23 Oct 2024 01:26:20 +0200 Tue, 30 Apr 2024 12:25:53 +0200 <![CDATA[Newsroom University of Manchester]]> https://content.presspage.com/clients/150_1369.jpg /about/news/ 144 University of Manchester recognised as Academic Centre of Excellence in Cyber Security Research /about/news/university-of-manchester-recognised-as-academic-centre-of-excellence-in-cyber-security-research/ /about/news/university-of-manchester-recognised-as-academic-centre-of-excellence-in-cyber-security-research/625267The University of Manchester has been named an Academic Centre of Excellence (ACE-CSR) in recognition of its internationally leading cyber security research.

 

]]>
The University of Manchester has been named an Academic Centre of Excellence (ACE-CSR) in recognition of its internationally leading cyber security research.

The University is one of 21 universities to receive the status by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and the National Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) - the UK's lead technical authority on cyber security.

It is one of several initiatives outlined in the UK government’s ‘Protecting and promoting the UK in a digital world’, which describes how the government is working with academia and industry to make the UK more resilient to cyber attacks.

The scheme aims to enhance the quality and scale of academic cybersecurity research and postgraduate training being undertaken in the UK; make it easier for potential users of research to identify the best cybersecurity research and postgraduate training that the UK has to offer; and help to develop a shared vision and aims among the UK cybersecurity research community, inside and outside academia.

The Centre will be led by colleagues in the University’s , which has a long history of world-leading cyber security research and will be directed by and co-directed by Professor Daniel Dresner and .

Nicholas Lord, Professor of Criminology at The University of Manchester, said: “We are very proud to be recognised as an Academic Centre of Excellence in Cyber Security Research. Receiving this status is further recognition of our long-standing commitment to world-leading cyber security research and key to the realisation of our five-year research plan.

“Our cyber security research has been a focal point for the University since founding our Digital Futures platform in 2018, with our sociotechnical approach to cyber security coming together recognisably in 2021 by the creation of our Centre for Digital Trust and Society - a truly unique Centre with a strong interdisciplinary nature.

“Over the next five years we hope that we can use our ACE-CSR recognition to strengthen our collaborations with other ACEs and NCSC, as well as enhance our collaborations with the Greater 91ֱ Combined Authority with a view to integrating cyber security into the city region’s business community.”

Professor Colette Fagan, Vice-President for Research at The University of Manchester, added: “I am thrilled that our University has been recognised as an Academic Centre of Excellence in Cyber Security Research. This achievement, led by our Centre for Digital Trust and Security, underscores our commitment to pioneering cyber security research and innovation through interdisciplinary collaborative research. This approach and ambition is vital to ensure that the benefits of the rapid pace of technological change are developed in ways that ensure a safe and more secure digital world for our citizens and organisations.”

The University was required to show evidence of NCSC’s tough standards to be considered, including: commitment from the University's leadership team to support and invest in the University's cyber security research capacity and capability; a critical mass of academic staff engaged in leading-edge cyber security research; a proven track record of producing high impact cyber security research; and sustained funding from a variety of sources to ensure the continuing financial viability of the research team's activities.

Chris Ensor, Deputy Director Cyber Growth at NCSC, said: “I’m delighted that 21 universities have been recognised as Academic Centres of Excellence in Cyber Security Research, including four who have received the award for the first time. These recognitions are testament to the dedication of academics, support staff and senior management who have ensured that cyber security remains high on the university’s agenda. And they demonstrate that the UK has a growing number of world-class universities carrying out cutting-edge research into all areas of cyber security. We very much look forward to working with them over the coming years to tackle the most difficult cyber security challenges.”

The Centre for Digital Trust and Society at The University of Manchester is one of few cyber and digital security and trust research centre in the UK led from social science, rather than a computer science or engineering department.

It focuses on barriers to, and enablers of, trust in digital and cyber technologies and has more than 80 active researchers affiliated to the Centre.

The Centre prides itself on its strong interdisciplinary engagement across the University and supports six multi-disciplinary research clusters: Trusted Digital Systems, Digital Technologies and Crime, Workplace and Organisational Security, Democracy and Trust, Privacy and Trust and Advanced Mathematics.

Dr Mustafa, Senior Lecturer in Systems and Software Security at The University of Manchester, said: “While our cybersecurity research across the Department of Computer Science provides the fundamentals and foundations of our Centre’s research, our social science academics provide the societal relevance and context: secure cyber and digital systems are grounded in everyday human behaviours and interactions. It is for this reason that we coordinate our sociotechnical cybersecurity research activities ensuring the people and social factors remain central. We do this by engaging in cross-cluster and cross-disciplinary research activities, realising our sociotechnical work through internally and externally funded research.”

Over the next five years, researchers will work on a wide range of projects from cyber security controls, building secure and safe (AI) software to counter threats, through understanding offending and victimisation of cybercrimes, to the application of cyber security research in development and industry, as well as the cyber risks to political-economic systems and organisational workplaces, and the need for data privacy and security.

The ACE-CSR will continue to hold strong national and international links - in particular - to work with its partners in the Greater 91ֱ Cyber Ecosystem and the wider North West Cyber Corridor.

]]>
Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:34:31 +0000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_21-4.jpg?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/21-4.jpg?10000
First UK-wide evaluation since 2014 confirms University of Manchester is a research powerhouse /about/news/first-uk-wide-evaluation-since-2014-confirms-university-of-manchester-is-a-research-powerhouse/ /about/news/first-uk-wide-evaluation-since-2014-confirms-university-of-manchester-is-a-research-powerhouse/506081The University of Manchester has retained 5th place for research power - the quality and scale of research and impact - in the UK government’s Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021, the major national exercise to evaluate research activity, which was last held in 2014.

]]>
The University of Manchester has retained 5th place for research power1 - the quality and scale of research and impact - in the UK government’s Research Excellence Framework (REF) 2021, the major national exercise to evaluate research activity, which was last held in 2014.

91ֱ made one of the largest and broadest REF submissions in the UK, entering 2,249 eligible researchers across 31 subject areas.

Overall, 93% of the University’s research activity was assessed as ‘world-leading’ (4*) or ‘internationally excellent’. We also ranked in 10th place in terms of grade point average2, an improvement from 19th in the previous exercise, REF 2014. 

The Times Higher Education places us even higher at 8th on GPA (up from 17th place), as their analysis excludes specialist HE institutions. This result was built upon a significant increase in research assessed as ‘world leading’ (4*) between REF 2014 and REF 2021.

Researchers from the University consistently make an important contribution to solving the world’s most urgent problems, with the University ranking 9th in the world for delivering against the UN Sustainable Development Goals in the Times Higher Education Impact Rankings. 

Examples of this impact highlighted in the REF include improving cancer treatment, reducing carbon emissions from shipping and aviation and shaping international development policy to reduce poverty.

Many of these case studies are now published on the University website. They provide examples of how University of Manchester research has made a positive contribution to society, culture, public policy or services, health, the environment, quality of life and the economy - with benefits felt beyond academia.

Professor Dame Nancy Rothwell, President and Vice-Chancellor of The University of Manchester, said: "These comprehensive and independent results confirm 91ֱ's place as a global powerhouse of research.

“We create an environment where researchers can thrive and exchange ideas. Most importantly, the quality and impact of our research is down to the incredible dedication and creativity of our colleagues who work every day to solve significant world problems, enrich our society and train the next generation of researchers.

“The fact that our REF results are accompanied by examples of the real difference we’ve made in the world, all driven from this city makes me very proud.”

Detailed results have now been published on the University website. The University came in the top three nationally for the following subjects (Unit of Assessment by grade point average or research power): 

  • Allied Health Professions, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy
  • Business and Management Studies
  • Chemistry
  • Classics
  • Drama, Dance, Performing Arts, Film and Screen Studies
  • Development Studies
  • Engineering
  • Physics
  • Sociology

The University had 19 subjects in the top ten overall by grade point average and 15 when measured by research power.

The REF exercise also evaluated the University’s work to provide a creative, ambitious and supportive research environment, in which researchers at every career stage can develop and thrive as leaders in their chosen field. In this category, the University achieved a result of 99% internationally excellent or world leading, making it one of the best places in the country to build a research career.

1 Research Power is calculated by grade point average, multiplied by the number of FTE staff submitted (FTE - full-time equivalent head count) and gives a measure of scale and quality. Grade Point Average (GPA) measures overall or average quality of research, which takes no account of the FTE submitted.

2 Grade point average is a measure of the overall or average quality of research calculated by multiplying the percentage of research in each grade by its rating, adding them all together and dividing by 100.

]]>
Thu, 12 May 2022 00:00:26 +0100 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_iron_bird_13.jpg?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/iron_bird_13.jpg?10000
91ֱ criminologists to lead new research on policing modern slavery /about/news/manchester-criminologists-to-lead-new-research-on-policing-modern-slavery/ /about/news/manchester-criminologists-to-lead-new-research-on-policing-modern-slavery/486652Criminologists at The University of Manchester are delighted to be part of a new Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) Centre dedicated to better understanding how the police and other services can prevent and reduce vulnerabilities.

The Vulnerability and Policing Futures Research Centre, led by the universities of York and Leeds, is the first of its kind to study how vulnerabilities - such as exploitation by county lines drug networks, online child sexual exploitation, domestic abuse, modern slavery, mental illness and homelessness - affect policing.

Within the Centre, and will lead a project that seeks to redefine what realistic outcomes with regard to policing modern slavery might look like and how these could encompass a preventative dimension that reduces demand on police services over the longer term.

The project aims to:

  • address the question of what kinds of reporting are genuinely useful to modern slavery investigations;
  • identify what causes the attrition between the police bringing charges for modern slavery offences and the comparatively small number of convictions;
  • and identify the key drivers of modern slavery in cases where offenders have been successfully prosecuted.

Find out more:

]]>
Fri, 17 Dec 2021 11:44:32 +0000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_shutterstock-1523394551.jpg?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/shutterstock-1523394551.jpg?10000
New police research project awards /about/news/new-police-research-project-awards/ /about/news/new-police-research-project-awards/486564The 91ֱ-based N8 Police Research Partnership has announced funding for four new projects investigating the policing of exploitation and abuse.

With projects on preventing cuckooing, disrupting domestic abuse, recording honour based violence, and identifying victims of coercive control, all four projects have the potential to reduce harm to some of the most vulnerable people in the UK.

The is a pioneering partnership between the (Durham, Lancaster, Leeds, Liverpool, 91ֱ, Newcastle, Sheffield, and York) and 12 northern police forces. N8 PRP works to improve police practice through collaborative and co-produced work, supporting academics and supporting police to advance research and evidence-based policing.

The flagship programme of N8 PRP is the , which funds research on targeted, high-priority areas of policing work. Previous awards have achieved fantastic levels of impact on police practice. This includes the development of a national cybercurrency policing strategy, changes to national recording practices for modern slavery, and international consultation on domestic violence laws.

2021 is the first round of Small Grants since the partnership became fully self-funded, with support from all partners. The ambition is to dramatically increase the level of police involvement in research to expand opportunities for impact, and for the first time all police partners are involved in at least one grant. Many will be contributing data, interviews, and access to records, and all will take part in project Advisory Groups. These groups allow researchers to take advantage of the wide range of expertise and experience available in the forces, and increase the opportunities for impact on police practice.

The projects will also benefit from the academic excellence of N8 universities, with 4 of the N8 represented on the awarded bids (Durham, Leeds, Liverpool, and York). While N8 PRP’s funding means Small Grant funds can only be held by N8 universities, 2 projects include co-investigators from other regional universities (UCLAN and Northumbria). This points to the continued regional partnerships that N8 PRP hopes to develop in the coming year.

Find out more about the awarded projects and N8 PRP:

]]>
Thu, 16 Dec 2021 15:03:45 +0000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_n8prplogo.jpg?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/n8prplogo.jpg?10000
MEd Psychology of Education re-accredited by the British Psychological Society /about/news/med-psychology-of-education-re-accredited-by-the-british-psychological-society/ /about/news/med-psychology-of-education-re-accredited-by-the-british-psychological-society/486334

The  recently visited the  to assess the MEd Psychology of Education programme and we are delighted to announce that the BPS recommended the programme retains the Society’s accreditation. In addition, the review team highlighted two areas worthy of commendations.

This excellent outcome is the result of the hard work of the programme director and the programme team. Dr MacQuarrie said:

"We are delighted with the outcome of the BPS accreditation process. The visiting team recognised that research informed knowledge forms the basis of teaching and learning and the applied nature of the qualification foregrounds the value of such knowledge to communities and audiences across psychology and education

"Particularly pleasing are the commendations that celebrate enhancements on the programme I have led and introduced in recent years. Receiving one commendation is fantastic and being awarded two is remarkable and reflects exceptional features of provision across the MEd.

"The first commendation refers to the innovative forms of assessment applied to issues and real world research that provides students with both depth and breadth of assessment opportunities.

"The second commendation refers to the enhanced elements of the dissertation noted as extending the reach of what students learn. I am particularly enthused by the second commendation. This is work I lead that is being referred to (commonly labelled as the Display Project - Developing and disseminating student projects with lay audiences) and is being picked up in other programmes in MIE."

The British Psychological Society-accredited MEd has been designed to prepare students for careers involving psychology by providing a strong grounding in psychology as applied to educational contexts.

For more details on the programme, please visit the M.Ed Psychology of Education programme page.

]]>
Wed, 15 Dec 2021 13:47:04 +0000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_bps.png?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/bps.png?10000
Professor Søren Holm appointed to the DARE UK Scientific and Technical Advisory Group. /about/news/professor-sren-holm-appointed-to-dare-uk-scientific-and-technical-advisory-group/ /about/news/professor-sren-holm-appointed-to-dare-uk-scientific-and-technical-advisory-group/486180DARE UK aims to design and deliver a national data research infrastructure that is joined-up, demonstrates trustworthiness and supports research at scale for public good.

is a programme initiated by .

Data has been fundamental to the UK’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. As the UK moves out of the critical phase and into recovery, there is a need to ensure the investments being made in data research infrastructure are joined-up, demonstrate trustworthiness and support research at scale for public good.

UKRI – a non-departmental public body and the UK’s largest public funder of research and innovation – is investing £17 million in the UK’s digital research infrastructure to fund a portfolio of initiatives to develop existing digital activities, or in target areas for closer cooperation across the UKRI research councils. One such initiative is the DARE UK programme.

Professor Holm, Professor of Bioethics in the , has been appointed to the DARE Scientific and Technical Advisory Group.

    More information about the programme is available on the DARE UK website:

    ]]>
    Tue, 14 Dec 2021 14:49:45 +0000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_soren-11-2.jpg?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/soren-11-2.jpg?10000
    Success for University undergraduates at prestigious awards /about/news/success-for-university-undergraduates-at-prestigious-awards/ /about/news/success-for-university-undergraduates-at-prestigious-awards/368300Two students from The University of Manchester have won the highest award possible at this year’s prestigious Undergraduate Awards in Dublin, Ireland.

    ]]>

    Two students from have won the highest award possible at this year’s prestigious  in Dublin, Ireland.

    Aayush Chadha and Stefan Pricopie were the Global Winners in the Engineering and Economics categories, respectively. They took home the for their academic research and presentations, while fellow University student Samanyou Garg was the Regional Winner in the Computer Science category.

    Aayush won his award for his final year project, “BL!NK: Detecting, Analysing and Storing Eye Blinks”. He developed a system to detect and track eye blinking, with applications in monitoring Parkinson’s disease.

    His work brings together his background in computer science, with elements of physics, health, and engineering. The senor was built using graphene, because “it is very conductive and very sensitive”, says Aayush. It was then connected to a data storage device, where the data could be processed to identify blink characteristics such as frequency.

    Speaking about his project, Aayush said; “While the project had elements that directly applied knowledge of Computer Science, most of the work required a good understanding of the physics involved, which was something I had to build up as I went along.”

    He added; “Thankfully, I had great support from my supervisory team, Prof Thomas Thomson and Dr Gregory Auton!”

    Samanyou won his award for a project on facial recognition in groups of people. “Automatic facial emotion recognition is a challenging task that had gained significant scientific interest,” Samanyou explains, “but the problem of emotion recognition for a group of people has been less extensively studied.”

    Samanyou’s project aimed to overcome some of the problems faced in group recognition, such as head and body pose variations, variable lighting conditions, and variable image quality. He used a dataset of more than 10,000 images to train recognition models, using a hybrid machine learning system that incorporated deep neural networks and Bayesian classifiers.

    Remarking on the significance of his achievement, Aayush said; “The Undergraduate Award means a much more widespread recognition of the idea’s merit, and its potential to be useful in the future. For a long time, eye blinking wasn’t looked at actively as a potential biomarker for tracking Parkinson’s disease, something which may now change.”

    Similarly, Samanyou said; “Receiving the Undergraduate Award is an absolute honour for me. Being recognised by UA for the work that I put in is so very special to me, as it means that my work had some meaningful impact and motivates me to work even harder.”

    The students attended a three-day summit in Dublin, where they were presented with their awards, as well as the opportunity to network with other winners and nominees. “I was able to meet people working on similar subjects,” said Aayush, adding; “Not only did that allow me to look at some of the problems I encountered from another perspective, but it also meant that I now have valuable contacts to reach out to in case I want to collaborate, or understand something about my research topic that doesn’t exactly fall in the purview of my project.”

    Samanyou said; “It was an amazing experience at the 3-day summit where I had the opportunity to meet and share research with some highly motivated and passionate people from around the world. The future felt far less daunting after hearing solutions to real-world problems from a multi-disciplinary perspective.

    “I would also like to thank The University of Manchester and my supervisor Prof Angelo Cangelosi for their support and for making this trip possible.”

    The summit also gave the students the chance to explore Dublin, where they found themselves “drinking Guinness and Jameson’s, dancing to Irish folk music and composing limericks”, says Aayush.

    The full list of Undergraduate Award winners from the University is;

    · Global Winner – Aayush Chadha (Engineering)

    · Global Winner – Stefan Pricopie (Economics)

    · Regional Winner – Samanyou Garg (Computer Science)

    · Highly Commended – Andrej Ivanon (Computer Science)

    · Highly Commended – Igor Wodiany (Computer Science)

    · Highly Commended – Matthew Caine (Politics and International Relations)

    · Highly Commended – Otilia Vintu (Anthropology and Cultural Studies)

    ]]>
    Fri, 22 Nov 2019 11:24:44 +0000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_ugawards2-859979.jpg?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/ugawards2-859979.jpg?10000
    Nobel laureates among University’s most highly cited researchers /about/news/nobel-laureates-among-universitys-most-highly-cited-researchers/ /about/news/nobel-laureates-among-universitys-most-highly-cited-researchers/36815014 researchers from The University of Manchester are some of the most highly cited in their field, in a new list from the Web of Science Group released this week.

    ]]>

    14 researchers from are some of the most highly cited in their field, in a new list from the released this week.

    They include Prof Sir Andre Geim and Prof Sir Kostya Novoselov, the co-discovers of graphene at the University in 2004, for which they won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 2010. Also on the list is fellow graphene researcher, Prof Irina Grigorieva, as well as Prof Jorgen Vestbo, a researcher in respiratory medicine, and Prof Frank Geels, and expert in energy and sustainability.

    The list identifies scientists and social scientists who produced multiple papers ranking in the top 1% by citations for their field and year of publication, demonstrating significant research influence among their peers.

    The methodology that determines the who’s who of influential researchers draws on the data and analysis performed by bibliometric experts from the Institute for Scientific Information at the Web of Science Group.

    The data are taken from 21 broad research fields within Essential Science Indicators, a component of . The fields are defined by sets of journals and exceptionally, in the case of multidisciplinary journals such as Nature and Science, by a paper-by-paper assignment to a field based on an analysis of the cited references in the papers. This percentile-based selection method removes the citation advantage of older papers relative to recently published ones, since papers are weighed against others in the same annual cohort.

    Listed University researchers;

    Prof Sir Andre Geim, Dr Artem Mischenko, Prof Christian Klingenberg, Prof David Denning, Dr Donald Ward, Prof Frank Geels, Prof Irina Grigorieva, Prof Jorgen Vestbo, Prof Judith Allen, Prof Sir Kostya Novoselov, Prof Rahul Nair, Prof Richard Bardgett, Dr Roman Gorbachev, and Prof Zhiguo Ding.

    ]]>
    Thu, 21 Nov 2019 14:32:22 +0000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_iron_bird_13.jpg?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/iron_bird_13.jpg?10000
    91ֱ students win gold for non-allergenic hair-dye /about/news/manchester-students-win-gold-for-non-allergenic-hair-dye/ /about/news/manchester-students-win-gold-for-non-allergenic-hair-dye/367350A team of students from The University of Manchester have won an award for genetically modifying bacteria to produce kinder hair-dyes.

    ]]>

    A team of students from have won an award for genetically modifying bacteria to produce kinder hair-dyes.

    The eight students, with academic guidance from the , the , and the , genetically engineered E. coli bacteria to secrete proteins which could colour, repair, straighten, and fragrance hair.

    For their work, they were awarded a gold medal in the (iGEM) competition. The focus of iGEM is to provide a synthetic biology-based solution to a real-world problem.

    The project aimed to explore an alternative to current hair-dyes which use often harmful chemicals, leading to allergic reactions in users, as well as environmental damage if not disposed of properly. They can also cause bleaching and brittle hair, and have been tentatively suggested as a potential carcinogen.

    “The initial idea,” said Elisa Barrow Molina, a third year biotechnology student, “came from an article we saw about how hair dyes could cause alarming reactions in some users.”

    The students genetically modified a strain of E. coli which naturally adheres to hair to secrete a dye, replacing the use of potential pollutant and carcinogens.

    After this initial idea, they also realised they could modify the bacteria to secrete other products, such as proteins to repair hair, and compounds to fragrance it. Through experiments, the students showed that their engineered bacteria were resilient when exposed to stresses such as chlorine or shampoo.

    They encountered several challenges during the process, though the biggest one “depends on who you ask!”, as the division of labour meant they were all meeting and overcoming different headaches during their work.

    Camilo Albornoz Carranza, a third year neuroscientist, says; “The synthetic biology was out of my comfort zone, but winning a gold medal vindicates all the work we put in.”

    On this note, the students are all in agreement. “This shows we did something worthwhile,” they say, considering it justification for the three months of lab work they put in over the summer. The award from iGEM “closes the chapter”, says Elisa.

    “That’s the thing about iGEM,” adds Sophie Guillemot, a third year chemist, “it’s about bringing ideas to the table and leaving them for the next team to develop further.”

    While they are not currently planning to commercialise the bacteria, the students also carefully considered potential safety concerns should their product ever make it to market. To address these, the students designed and computationally modelled two genetic ‘kill-switches’, which would prevent the engineered bacteria either surviving away from hair, or developing pathogenicity.

    “In ten or twenty years,” notes second year molecular biologist Thomas Harrison, “I think genetically modified bacteria will be part of our lives on a very intimate, primary level.”

    The project was initially financed by the University, but the students also sought out sponsors and private donors. They also consulted with the public and hair care experts, which resulted in the introduction of a straightening protein to their final design, as well as the exploration of a large range of colours.

    Going forward, the team plan to focus on their individual degrees. For some of them, the iGEM project has helped them to decide where they would like to work in the future. Mujtaba Ansari, a third year biotechnology student, says; “By participating, I’ve discovered that I really like research and lab work, and it’s definitely something I’d like to do in the future.”

    Prof Eriko Takano, supervisor of the iGEM team says “We are now looking for enthusiastic students to join the next year’s team. This is a great opportunity, not just for biology students but for students from all faculties who want to explore the revolutionary impact of new technologies and push their skills to new limits”.

    ]]>
    Thu, 14 Nov 2019 11:02:51 +0000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_igemteam-857847.jpg?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/igemteam-857847.jpg?10000
    New net zero emissions target won’t end UK’s contribution to global warming – here’s why /about/news/new-net-zero-emissions-target-wont-end-uks-contribution-to-global-warming--heres-why/ /about/news/new-net-zero-emissions-target-wont-end-uks-contribution-to-global-warming--heres-why/334043 

    File 20190501 117612 1i4debb.jpg?ixlib=rb 1.1

    Six months on from the UN’s landmark , which urged immediate global action to prevent global warming from rising beyond this dangerous level, the Committee on Climate Change (CCC) has the UK government to go zero-carbon by 2050. The committee’s report asserts that the target constitutes the country’s “highest possible ambition” and that it is not credible to aim for an earlier date.

    We disagree. While the report does challenge the government to step up its climate ambition, our view is that creative carbon accounting and an unwillingness to prioritise over economic growth leaves the committee’s target lacking the urgency truly required to combat the climate emergency recently by even the government itself.

    Creative accounting

    Before assessing whether 2050 is an appropriate date, its important to unpack exactly how the committee defines net zero. Based on from the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the UK’s target only includes territorial carbon emissions – those that are emitted directly within the country’s borders.

    The committee’s highlights that the country’s territorial carbon footprint has fallen by 30% from 2008. But as Swedish campaigner Greta Thunberg highlighted to parliament, using this figure as a mark of the country’s climate leadership amounts to nothing more than , glossing over the UK’s role in emissions that occur outside its borders.

    The UK economy is by its service sector, and the value of its imports is roughly that of its exports. The production and transport of these imported goods are a direct consequence of the UK’s consumption habits, but these emissions aren’t counted by the committee because they occur beyond its shores. Including these emissions and excluding emissions from exports to other countries, the UK’s carbon footprint is than the figure used by the committee.

     

    While territorial emissions have dropped, the UK’s consumption-based emissions are closely tied to economic growth.

    Kate Scott/University of Manchester, Author provided

    Crucially, this alternative definition shows that emissions are still closely tied to the UK’s GDP, only notably reducing during the most recent and remaining steady in recent years. The CCC does say that it will monitor the UK’s consumption-based emissions, and highlights that the country must avoid “” its territorial emissions by importing more goods. But it stops well short of addressing the fundamental elephant in the room – that to seriously tackle emissions, the UK must from an economy that prioritises short-term growth over radical emission reductions.

    On the surface, the most glaring omission in past carbon budgets at least appears to have been addressed. Emissions from international aviation and shipping have long been excluded from national targets in favour of international reduction efforts such as or the . The committee now argues that “emissions from international aviation and shipping cannot be ignored”.

    But it only recommends their inclusion in the UK’s carbon budget from 2033. This is 14 years too late. UK aviation emissions in the next decade if it is to prevent the worst effects of global warming. The time to act on aviation and shipping is now.

    Highest possible ambition?

    Even placing accounting issues aside, the 2050 target is unambitious and gives a false impression that there is time to play with. , chair of the committee, is almost certainly right that Extinction Rebellion’s that the country reaches net zero by 2025 is physically impossible. Shedding the country’s attachment to growth lead to a neutral carbon ledger. The massive amounts of investment, innovation and infrastructure required to get there would not take full effect within six years.

    But to say that anything earlier than a 2050 target isn’t credible is a grave and dangerous mistake. At current levels of emissions, the world will reach 1.5°C of warming in . Each year that the UK delays radical action, the necessary yearly emissions cuts to hit net zero become greater, making it to avoid catastrophic warming. Even with immediate action, the world is still pinning hopes on carbon capture and storage technologies that work at scale. Working towards an earlier target with steeper emissions cuts would require initial uncomfortable changes, but would massively lower our reliance on these incredibly uncertain technologies.

     

    According to the committee, fossil fuel powered cars should be phased out sooner.

    The report’s claim that the 2050 target represents the UK’s “highest possible ambition” speaks more to than to reality. Ten years ago, the committee wrote that an in emissions by 2050 (against 1990 levels) was at the limit of feasibility.

    Now, the committee has changed its mind, stating that net zero can be achieved by the same date, for the same price: 1-2% of GDP. This small percentage is seen as the maximum acceptable cost of mitigating climate change, even in the face of the losses that are forecast if we do not take sufficient action. Is this really all the fate of present and future generations at risk of climate change is worth?

    The report does hold some positives. It is unequivocal that current policy is insufficient to achieve even the UK’s existing targets and urges a ramping up in actionable efforts. It criticises as too late and too vague, and calls for the government to confront failures to plant enough carbon-absorbing trees and decarbonise heating systems.

    But in focusing on what is “feasible” rather than necessary, the committee’s trajectories simply do not reflect the radical carbon reductions the UK can make, and will only end the UK’s contribution to global warming on paper.

    The year 2025 may be an unrealistic target, but missing that by a few years is much less dangerous than hitting a 2050 target comfortably. We need to take every leap we can and fast, even if it is into the dark. As Greta Thunberg , if your house is on fire, you don’t tell people that the fire brigade will be along in a few hours – you act.

     

    , Lecturer,  and , PhD Candidate, Sustainable Consumption Institute, 

    This article is republished from  under a Creative Commons license. Read the .

     

     

    The Conversation

     

     

    ]]>
    Thu, 02 May 2019 11:30:00 +0100 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/500_renewable-1989416-1920.jpg?10000 https://content.presspage.com/uploads/1369/renewable-1989416-1920.jpg?10000